Meal Breaks for California Employees

In California non-exempt employees must be “provided” a 30-minute meal period for ever five hours worked.  Employees who work ten hours or more in a workday must be provided with two 30-minute meal periods.  However, there are exceptions: (1) if the employee works six hours or less and consents in writing to waive the meal period; or (2) if the employee works less than twelve hours and the employee actually takes the first meal break, then the employee can waive the second meal period.  Employers are not required to pay employees for any meal period.

California courts have not agreed on the exact meaning of the word “provide.”   One court has held that an employer has an “affirmative obligation to ensure that workers are actually relieved of all duty” during their meal period.  Another group of courts held that employers need not require that employees take meal breaks as long as they are allowed to take them.  (The issue is now before the California Supreme Court for clarification.)

Nonetheless, if an employer fails to relieve a non-exempt employee of all duties or does not permit the employee to leave the premises during a meal period, then it is considered an “on duty” meal period.  For each missed meal period, the employer must pay the employee one additional hour of pay at the employee’s regular pay rate.  This meal period pay is capped at one hour of pay for each workday (even if the employee was not given the second meal period).  Employees generally have a private right of action to recover meal period pay, and the statute of limitations for recovering pay for a missed meal periods is three years.

Read more

A recent case against Costco Wholesale Corp. reveals the legal obligations employers have beyond the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA).

Insights from the Costco Lawsuit: How Medical Leave and Reasonable Accommodations Intersect in California

When a medical crisis hits, workers often assume their employer will follow the law, offer support and make reasonable accommodations. But what happens when the company’s leave policy limits clash with California…

READ ARTICLE
Mobley alleges that Workday’s AI system discriminated against him based on his race, age and disability status.

When Algorithms Make the Decisions: What Workers Should Know About AI and Employment Discrimination

Hiring practices have changed dramatically in the last decade. Many job seekers today never speak to a person during the early stages of applying for work. Instead, they interact with software platforms…

READ ARTICLE
While AI tools can speed up hiring and reduce paperwork, they also raise serious concerns about fairness.

Can AI Be Biased? What California Workers Should Know About the New Rules for Hiring Technology

Artificial intelligence has become a major player in the workplace, especially in hiring. Whether you realize it or not, many employers now use automated tools to screen resumes, rank candidates and even…

READ ARTICLE
A recent investigation at Angry Fish Sushi in San Leandro revealed multiple labor law violations that directly impacted workers’ pay and legal protections.

San Leandro Sushi Restaurant Cited for Wage Theft Over Stolen Tips and Unpaid Overtime

Wage theft is a common issue in California’s restaurant industry, where workers may be paid in cash, often rely on tips and work long or irregular hours. A recent investigation at Angry…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10