Pregnancy Discrimination Under Federal Title VII

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act was amended in 1978 to include the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (“PDA”).  The PDA protects pregnant persons from being discriminated against by their employers because of their pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions.

The Equal Benefits Clause of the PDA requires that persons affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions be treated the same for employment purposes.  This protects employees or potential employees from discrimination in hiring, pregnancy or maternity leave, health insurance plans, and fringe benefits:
•    Hiring: it is a violation of the PDA to refuse to hire or to fire a person because that person is pregnant or has delivered a child. Further, aborting a pregnancy is considered a related medical condition and therefore falls within the purview of the PDA.  Accordingly, an employer may not refuse to hire or fire an employee for having procured an abortion.

•    Pregnancy/Maternity Leave: if a pregnant person is temporarily unable to perform their essential job duties because of their pregnancy or related medical conditions, that employee must be treated in the same manner as all other employees who suffer from a temporary disability. An employer must hold the employee’s position open for the same length of time for which the employer holds open jobs for employees on sick leave or disability leave. Further, if an employee claims that they are unable to work due to their pregnancy, the employer is prohibited from subjecting the employee to alternate or additional procedures to determine their capacity to work that exceed those to which employees that assert a temporary disability are subjected.

•    Health Insurance Plans: an employer is not obligated to offer pregnancy benefits.  If the employer does so, the plan must treat pregnancy, childbirth and related conditions in the same manner as all other conditions covered by the plan.  However, it is not sex discrimination where the employer does not provide health insurance that covers abortions except where the life of the pregnant person is endangered.  Additionally, the plan may not differentiate between married and unmarried pregnant employees.

•    Fringe Benefits: pregnancy-related benefits cannot be limited to married persons but must also be offered to unmarried persons. If the employer provides any benefits to workers on leave, the same benefits must be offered to those who take leave because of their pregnancy.

In addition, it is unlawful for an employer to retaliate against any employee – whether pregnant or non-pregnant – for opposing employment practices that discriminate on the basis of pregnancy.

Read more

When workers face harassment or unfair treatment, the consequences can extend far beyond a bad day at the office.

Oakland Settles $1 Million Lawsuit After City Worker Reports Sexual Harassment and Retaliation by Successive Supervisors

When workers face harassment or unfair treatment, the consequences can extend far beyond a bad day at the office. A recent lawsuit settlement involving a former employee of Oakland’s Department of Violence…

READ ARTICLE
One recent case involving CleanNet USA, a janitorial franchising company, is a clear example of what can happen when employers try to sidestep labor laws.

Janitorial Company Pays Millions to California Workers Over Misclassification

Many California workers may not realize they are entitled to more legal protections than their job title suggests. This is especially true in industries where companies rely on complicated business models that…

READ ARTICLE
A recent case against Costco Wholesale Corp. reveals the legal obligations employers have beyond the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA).

Insights from the Costco Lawsuit: How Medical Leave and Reasonable Accommodations Intersect in California

When a medical crisis hits, workers often assume their employer will follow the law, offer support and make reasonable accommodations. But what happens when the company’s leave policy limits clash with California…

READ ARTICLE
Mobley alleges that Workday’s AI system discriminated against him based on his race, age and disability status.

When Algorithms Make the Decisions: What Workers Should Know About AI and Employment Discrimination

Hiring practices have changed dramatically in the last decade. Many job seekers today never speak to a person during the early stages of applying for work. Instead, they interact with software platforms…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10