Using Sick Leave to Care for Family Members

In general, California does not require employers to provide paid sick leave to their employees nor are employers obligated to give employees unpaid sick leave.  Also, even if sick leave is provided, California labor law does not treat the leave as “wages” that must be paid out upon employment separation.  Accordingly, employers may institute a “use or lose it” sick leave policy setting limits on the amount of sick leave.  The exception is employees working within Oakland city limits.

Sick leave at its most basic level allows an employee to take time off for the employee’s illness, injury or medical condition; obtaining professional diagnosis or treatment; or for other medical reasons.  If sick leave is offered, then employers are required to comply with California’s kin care law, Labor Code § 233.  Under this law, employers must allow employees to use “accrued and available sick leave” to care for family members such as children, parents, a spouse, domestic partner, or child of a domestic partner.  Employees may use up to one half of their accrued sick leave to care for family members.

In McCarther v. Pacific Telesis Group, the California Supreme Court determined that California’s kin care law “does not apply to any and all forms of compensated time off for illness,” but applied solely to sick leave defined in the statute.  In that case, the employer provided for sick leave at full pay for up to five consecutive days in a seven-day period and did not provide a cap on the amount of paid sick leave available to its employees.  So long as an employee returned from his or her sick leave, the employee could take additional sick leave in five-day increments for an indefinite period. The employer, however, did not provide paid sick leave for absences to take care of family members.

The Supreme Court concluded that unlimited or uncapped offers of sick leave to employers did not fall within section 233’s meaning of “sick leave.”  Since California Labor Code § 233 defines sick leave as “accrued incremented of compensated leave,” the Court concluded that the statute language was “limited to employers that provided a measurable, banked amount of sick leave.”  Accordingly, since unlimited sick leave policies do not accrue and are not “banked,” they are not covered by California’s kin care law.

Read more

disability discrimination lawyer

Partial paraplegic engineer gets $425K in San Diego disability discrimination suit

Employees with disabilities deserve to have flourishing careers and opportunities to earn a living, just like anyone else. Unfortunately, far too often workers with disabilities do not fully understand their rights and…

READ ARTICLE
age discrimination lawyer

Santa Monica College instructor’s age discrimination suit reinstated

Discrimination lawsuits often go hand in hand with other employment violations. For example, if an employee was fired based on their age, they would also have a wrongful termination claim. If a…

READ ARTICLE
wrongful termination lawyer

California furniture store employee fired after testing positive for COVID-19

The coronavirus pandemic has presented a whole host of issues for workplaces across California. While companies have been forced to deal with various hardships, what many people may not realize is that…

READ ARTICLE
disability discrimination lawyer

Sacramento car dealership sued for firing worker who might have cancer

There are laws in place to protect employees from being discriminated against or fired based on their disability. When a used car dealership in Sacramento, California, fired an employee shortly after finding…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10