Vacation Pay for California Employees

There is no California or federal law, which requires employers to provide employees with vacation time.  Nonetheless, if the employer does provide vacation time, certain provisions of the California Labor Code must be followed.

Vacation time is treated as deferred wages and accrues and vests proportionately as time worked.  Therefore, California employers cannot have a “use it or lose it” policy by which earned vacation expires.  Employers may, however, put reasonable caps on accrued vacation, provided those caps were disclosed to the employee beforehand (e.g. in the employee handbook, offer letter, or the employment agreement).  A vacation pay policy will likely violate state law if the cap on accrual is so small that it is, in practice, a “use it or lose it” policy.

An employer’s policy generally controls how much vacation time an employee earns, and different amounts of vacation time may be given to different employees if the policy is clear. Employers are generally permitted to exclude certain employees from the vacation time policy for a certain amount of time at the beginning of employment (e.g. during a probationary period). Also, the employer is free to control when vacation is taken and how much vacation is taken at any one time.

Generally, all accrued vacation is due upon termination, layoff or quit, and an employment contract cannot force an employee to forfeit earned vacation.

The statute of limitations to bring a claim for unpaid vacation is three years from the date the employee is terminated or resigns. This statute of limitations begins to run when employment ends, not when the employee’s vacation accrued. Thus, an employee can recover any vacation that vested during the employment relationship, even if it accrued long before the filing of the claim.

Read more

One recent case involving CleanNet USA, a janitorial franchising company, is a clear example of what can happen when employers try to sidestep labor laws.

Janitorial Company Pays Millions to California Workers Over Misclassification

Many California workers may not realize they are entitled to more legal protections than their job title suggests. This is especially true in industries where companies rely on complicated business models that…

READ ARTICLE
A recent case against Costco Wholesale Corp. reveals the legal obligations employers have beyond the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA).

Insights from the Costco Lawsuit: How Medical Leave and Reasonable Accommodations Intersect in California

When a medical crisis hits, workers often assume their employer will follow the law, offer support and make reasonable accommodations. But what happens when the company’s leave policy limits clash with California…

READ ARTICLE
Mobley alleges that Workday’s AI system discriminated against him based on his race, age and disability status.

When Algorithms Make the Decisions: What Workers Should Know About AI and Employment Discrimination

Hiring practices have changed dramatically in the last decade. Many job seekers today never speak to a person during the early stages of applying for work. Instead, they interact with software platforms…

READ ARTICLE
While AI tools can speed up hiring and reduce paperwork, they also raise serious concerns about fairness.

Can AI Be Biased? What California Workers Should Know About the New Rules for Hiring Technology

Artificial intelligence has become a major player in the workplace, especially in hiring. Whether you realize it or not, many employers now use automated tools to screen resumes, rank candidates and even…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10