California EDD to pay $2 million in disability discrimination lawsuit over an office chair
Under California law, certain employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations to workers with disabilities. Accommodations such as altering work schedules or installing assistive equipment can allow employees to carry out the essential tasks of their job.
In a recent disability discrimination lawsuit, an office assistant with disabilities received a $2.1 million settlement when her employer retaliated against her for requesting a special office chair and modification of her work duties. The plaintiff, Laura Torres, worked at the Employment Development Department (EDD) office in San Francisco.
Torres had back surgery a year after starting work. In a memo to EDD bosses, her doctor recommended they purchase a special chair so she could continue working without too much pain.
Torres requested a specific model that cost $1,200. Instead of accommodating her need for the chair, the EDD suggested cheaper alternatives that left her unable to go through the workday without considerable pain.
Torres then went on medical leave. She filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), alleging that delaying the office chair’s purchase was a form of disability discrimination. The EDD eventually bought the requested chair, which enabled Torres to return to work.
Upon her return, Torres asked for further accommodation as she needed frequent bathroom breaks due to her condition. Initially, the employer granted her request to be removed from switchboard duty and assigned work near the restroom.
However, Torres was moved back to switchboard duties after an EEOC investigator came to the office to follow up on her earlier chair-related complaint. While the EDD maintained that answering phones was part of her job, Torres claimed her employer retaliated against her.
The EDD refused to take Torres off switchboard duty even though there was an incident in which she failed to reach the bathroom in time. She lost 50 pounds because she avoided eating and drinking during her shifts to avoid another accident.
Torres took a second medical leave and did not return to work after her boss denied her request for extending the leave. Ultimately, she won a settlement in a disability discrimination and retaliation lawsuit against the EDD.
Employees who are disabled have the right to request reasonable accommodations. Under California law, employers are required to participate in good faith and a timely interactive process to discuss accommodations. Accommodations must be provided unless doing so would cause the employer undue hardship, such as excessive cost.
Read more
Insights from the Costco Lawsuit: How Medical Leave and Reasonable Accommodations Intersect in California
When a medical crisis hits, workers often assume their employer will follow the law, offer support and make reasonable accommodations. But what happens when the company’s leave policy limits clash with California…
When Algorithms Make the Decisions: What Workers Should Know About AI and Employment Discrimination
Hiring practices have changed dramatically in the last decade. Many job seekers today never speak to a person during the early stages of applying for work. Instead, they interact with software platforms…
Can AI Be Biased? What California Workers Should Know About the New Rules for Hiring Technology
Artificial intelligence has become a major player in the workplace, especially in hiring. Whether you realize it or not, many employers now use automated tools to screen resumes, rank candidates and even…
San Leandro Sushi Restaurant Cited for Wage Theft Over Stolen Tips and Unpaid Overtime
Wage theft is a common issue in California’s restaurant industry, where workers may be paid in cash, often rely on tips and work long or irregular hours. A recent investigation at Angry…
SEEN ON



