Sexual harassment complaints highlight need for change at VA

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) clinics in the Oakland Bay Area have come under fire after three female VA employees recently shared stories of sexual harassment they experienced in the workplace. The allegations indicate that the agency needs to reassess its internal policies to ensure employees are protected and that their complaints are taken seriously.

One woman told KPIX 5 that her supervisor not only harassed her but also allegedly ended up assaulting her. “I was cornered in his office to where he tried to grope me, he tried to kiss me. He literally exposed himself to me, making snide comments,” she said. He threatened her with termination if she ever told anyone about it. The supervisor was later transferred to another VA clinic following an internal investigation.

A second sexual harassment victim shared a similar story about a different supervisor at the same VA hospital. She said her requests to get reassigned to a new position were ignored. According to KPIX 5, VA employees said a culture of fear persists at the agency. Its leadership intimidates and punishes anyone who complains about sexual harassment or other workplace issues. Often, victims find it difficult to fight back as their jobs are on the line.

Responding to the sexual harassment allegations in an interview, VA Northern California Health Care System Director David Stockwell defended the VA’s investigative process. He said, “They [employees] can certainly vote with their feet about their employment decisions of working with the VA.”

However, he quickly backtracked on his comments after receiving backlash for implying that women who experience sexual harassment should just quit their jobs at the VA. “That’s not my values. That’s not the values of this organization, and frankly, that was not what I intended to say,” Stockwell said.

The VA released a statement saying that the department investigates all sexual harassment allegations through various channels. In addition, there are “legal and administrative consequences” for offenders.

[footer block_id=’778′]

Read more

One recent case involving CleanNet USA, a janitorial franchising company, is a clear example of what can happen when employers try to sidestep labor laws.

Janitorial Company Pays Millions to California Workers Over Misclassification

Many California workers may not realize they are entitled to more legal protections than their job title suggests. This is especially true in industries where companies rely on complicated business models that…

READ ARTICLE
A recent case against Costco Wholesale Corp. reveals the legal obligations employers have beyond the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA).

Insights from the Costco Lawsuit: How Medical Leave and Reasonable Accommodations Intersect in California

When a medical crisis hits, workers often assume their employer will follow the law, offer support and make reasonable accommodations. But what happens when the company’s leave policy limits clash with California…

READ ARTICLE
Mobley alleges that Workday’s AI system discriminated against him based on his race, age and disability status.

When Algorithms Make the Decisions: What Workers Should Know About AI and Employment Discrimination

Hiring practices have changed dramatically in the last decade. Many job seekers today never speak to a person during the early stages of applying for work. Instead, they interact with software platforms…

READ ARTICLE
While AI tools can speed up hiring and reduce paperwork, they also raise serious concerns about fairness.

Can AI Be Biased? What California Workers Should Know About the New Rules for Hiring Technology

Artificial intelligence has become a major player in the workplace, especially in hiring. Whether you realize it or not, many employers now use automated tools to screen resumes, rank candidates and even…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10