Severance Agreements and Unemployment Benefits – Potential Pitfalls for the Unemployed

There is no federal or California law that requires employers to pay “severance” pay to employees who resign or are terminated.  However, some employees may be offered severance pay – sometimes because the employer wants to “buy peace” to avoid a potential lawsuit and other times because the employer is required by union contract, severance pay plan, or other legal document to offer severance.  Severance pay is usually offered only in exchange for a release of any potential claims against the employer, and the “release agreement” is a legally binding contract.

The newly unemployed may encounter some issues when applying for unemployment insurance benefits if they have received severance pay.  In general, severance pay is usually not considered “wages” and thus the employee may begin collecting unemployment benefits after the initial waiting period.

However, if the employer terminates the employee, but continues to pay their wages, these payments may be considered “in-lieu-of-notice” or “wage continuation” pay.  In these situations, the employee will not receive unemployment benefits for the period covered by the payments.  The California Employment Development Department (EDD) considers several factors in determining if the payment is severance pay including whether: (1) a company policy or plan allows for severance pay; (2) the company policy indicates that specific reasons trigger the severance pay (e.g. job elimination, reduction in force); (3) the payments are available to a class of employees (although not necessarily all employees); and (4) plan does not state the purpose for the payment.  If the payment is made in a lump sum, it will almost certainly be considered severance pay and will not reduce the employee’s benefits.

On the other hand, when an employee is kept on the payroll after termination, receives paychecks on the regular payday, and continues to accrue benefits (e.g. vacation or sick time), the payments may be considered “wage continuation pay” or “in-lieu-of-notice pay” which would delay employee’s entitlement to benefits.  It is important to recognize that the label given the payments does not affect the EDD’s determination.

Since these distinctions are not always clear, employees should not wait to apply for unemployment benefits merely because they are kept on their employer’s payroll and continue to receive payments after termination.

Read more

Age discrimination remains a persistent issue in workplaces, particularly for workers aged 50 and older.

AARP Study Reveals Ongoing Struggles Against Workplace Age Discrimination

Age discrimination remains a persistent issue in workplaces, particularly for workers aged 50 and older. A study by AARP revealed that six in 10 workers over 50 have witnessed or experienced subtle…

READ ARTICLE
The recent $43.25 million settlement by the Walt Disney Company is a stark reminder that even industry giants are not immune to allegations of unlawful pay practices.

Disney Settles Gender Pay Lawsuit for $43 Million, Impacting Thousands of Female Workers

Across industries, workers often face pay disparities that can lead to financial struggles, stress and a sense of injustice. Unfortunately, unequal pay is not uncommon, even at some of the largest and…

READ ARTICLE
The owners of the Radisson Hotel near Oakland Airport are facing a wage theft lawsuit brought by the city of Oakland.

Radisson Hotel in Oakland Sued for Alleged Wage Theft of Over $400K: Key Takeaways for Workers

Fair wages are a fundamental right for California workers. However, unpaid wages continue to affect employees in the hospitality industry and other sectors. Wage theft occurs when employers illegally deny workers the…

READ ARTICLE
Sexual harassment in the workplace is a reality that far too many employees face, and the recent $2.6 million jury verdict against the city of Oakland sheds light on this persistent issue.

Oakland’s $2.6 Million Wake-Up Call: Addressing Workplace Sexual Harassment

Sexual harassment in the workplace is a reality that far too many employees face, and the recent $2.6 million jury verdict against the city of Oakland sheds light on this persistent issue….

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10