Appeals court reinstates disability discrimination suit against Comcast

A federal appeals court overturned a lower court’s decision and reinstated a discrimination case filed by a former Comcast Inc. employee. The customer service representative was terminated while she was on leave to recover from a brain hemorrhage.

Gloria Rodriguez claimed Comcast fired her in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), the state’s anti-discrimination law. In a disability discrimination lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Oakland, she accused her former employer of retaliation, failure to accommodate and failure to participate in an interactive process. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Oakland unanimously reversed the district court’s decision to grant Comcast’s motion for dismissing the case.

The telecommunications company allegedly violated the FEHA when it did not grant Rodriguez her request for more leave, which is a form of reasonable accommodation. It is also illegal for employers to fire employees in retaliation for participating in a protected activity, such as complaining about workplace misconduct or taking medical leave.

Rodriguez had worked for Comcast for 25 years when she developed symptoms that required brain surgery. Under her doctor’s guidelines, she planned to return to work in March 2016 after her leave. However, Comcast terminated her employment during a phone call in November 2015.

Reasonable accommodations are various forms of assistance that enable an employee with a disability to continue working. Employers are required by law to discuss accommodations with employees upon request. If you have experienced disability discrimination in the workplace arising from your employer’s refusal to provide reasonable accommodation or engage in an interactive process to discuss accommodation, discuss your case with Erlich Law Firm.

Read more

One recent case involving CleanNet USA, a janitorial franchising company, is a clear example of what can happen when employers try to sidestep labor laws.

Janitorial Company Pays Millions to California Workers Over Misclassification

Many California workers may not realize they are entitled to more legal protections than their job title suggests. This is especially true in industries where companies rely on complicated business models that…

READ ARTICLE
A recent case against Costco Wholesale Corp. reveals the legal obligations employers have beyond the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA).

Insights from the Costco Lawsuit: How Medical Leave and Reasonable Accommodations Intersect in California

When a medical crisis hits, workers often assume their employer will follow the law, offer support and make reasonable accommodations. But what happens when the company’s leave policy limits clash with California…

READ ARTICLE
Mobley alleges that Workday’s AI system discriminated against him based on his race, age and disability status.

When Algorithms Make the Decisions: What Workers Should Know About AI and Employment Discrimination

Hiring practices have changed dramatically in the last decade. Many job seekers today never speak to a person during the early stages of applying for work. Instead, they interact with software platforms…

READ ARTICLE
While AI tools can speed up hiring and reduce paperwork, they also raise serious concerns about fairness.

Can AI Be Biased? What California Workers Should Know About the New Rules for Hiring Technology

Artificial intelligence has become a major player in the workplace, especially in hiring. Whether you realize it or not, many employers now use automated tools to screen resumes, rank candidates and even…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10