Female workers of P.F. Chang’s allege sexual harassment

Five female employees in Southern California have come forward with sexual harassment claims against P.F. Chang’s. They alleged the company failed to help them or address their complaints.

The women worked in the restaurant chain’s locations in Beverly Hills, Anaheim, Chino Hills and Riverside. Four of them are currently in arbitration proceedings with the company as required by their employment contracts, which prevented them from pursuing legal action in court.

The fifth woman was 16 years old when she started working at P.F. Chang’s in Beverly Hills in 2012. Her case went to Los Angeles County Superior Court after her attorneys successfully argued she was not of legal age to consent to the arbitration requirement. The woman said she was fired in 2014 after being sexually harassed during her two years of employment at the restaurant.

According to complaints filed with the arbitrator on behalf of the five employees, supervisors and coworkers subjected them to unwanted sexual comments and attention, inappropriate touching and attempted kissing. All of the women said they reported the behavior to their managers or P.F. Chang’s human resources department. However, management did not take any action to remedy the situation. Instead, they allegedly retaliated against the female employees by cutting their hours or transferring them to restaurant branches up to three hours away from their homes.

In response to the allegations, P.F. Chang’s released a statement saying, “While we can’t comment on pending litigation, we can tell you that P.F. Chang’s is committed to providing a workplace free of any type of unlawful harassment or discrimination.”

This is not the first time P.F. Chang’s has been involved in a sexual harassment case. In 2014, two female restaurant employees were awarded a combined total of around $1 million in arbitration. They claimed they had been sexually harassed at P.F. Chang’s locations in Carlsbad and La Jolla in San Diego.

[footer block_id=’778′]

Read more

When workers face harassment or unfair treatment, the consequences can extend far beyond a bad day at the office.

Oakland Settles $1 Million Lawsuit After City Worker Reports Sexual Harassment and Retaliation by Successive Supervisors

When workers face harassment or unfair treatment, the consequences can extend far beyond a bad day at the office. A recent lawsuit settlement involving a former employee of Oakland’s Department of Violence…

READ ARTICLE
One recent case involving CleanNet USA, a janitorial franchising company, is a clear example of what can happen when employers try to sidestep labor laws.

Janitorial Company Pays Millions to California Workers Over Misclassification

Many California workers may not realize they are entitled to more legal protections than their job title suggests. This is especially true in industries where companies rely on complicated business models that…

READ ARTICLE
A recent case against Costco Wholesale Corp. reveals the legal obligations employers have beyond the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA).

Insights from the Costco Lawsuit: How Medical Leave and Reasonable Accommodations Intersect in California

When a medical crisis hits, workers often assume their employer will follow the law, offer support and make reasonable accommodations. But what happens when the company’s leave policy limits clash with California…

READ ARTICLE
Mobley alleges that Workday’s AI system discriminated against him based on his race, age and disability status.

When Algorithms Make the Decisions: What Workers Should Know About AI and Employment Discrimination

Hiring practices have changed dramatically in the last decade. Many job seekers today never speak to a person during the early stages of applying for work. Instead, they interact with software platforms…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10