Hewlett Packard faces age discrimination lawsuit

Four former employees sued Hewlett Packard for age discrimination, alleging they were fired as part of a sweeping five-year restructuring effort, “to make the company younger.”

The proposed class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court in San Jose, California, on August 18. Both HP Inc. and HP Enterprise have been named defendants in the suit as the technology giant separated into two distinct companies in November 2015.

The plaintiffs, who range from 52 to 63 years of age, claimed they were wrongfully targeted on the basis of age in violation of state and federal laws. According to the complaint, “HP has hired a disproportionately large number of new employees under the age of 40 to replace employees aged 40 and older who were terminated.”

The plaintiffs were laid off when HP implemented a workplace reduction plan allegedly designed to purge older workers. The Palo Alto-based company announced 27,000 job cuts in 2012. Since then, it has slashed its workforce by 80,000 with the alleged goal of transforming itself, “from an ‘old’ company into a ‘younger’ operation.” HP argued its job cuts were based on valid reasons unrelated to age.

In addition, the complaint claimed HP’s human resources department issued discriminatory written hiring guidelines in 2013. The updated policy required 75 percent of outside hires to be young graduates or “early career” applicants.

California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act and the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act protect employees over age 40 from workplace discrimination or discriminatory hiring practices.

If you suspect you have been terminated or otherwise discriminated against on the basis of your age, the employment attorneys at Erlich Law Firm can help you understand your rights under the law. Free consultations are available; call 415-296-8420.

Read more

When workers face harassment or unfair treatment, the consequences can extend far beyond a bad day at the office.

Oakland Settles $1 Million Lawsuit After City Worker Reports Sexual Harassment and Retaliation by Successive Supervisors

When workers face harassment or unfair treatment, the consequences can extend far beyond a bad day at the office. A recent lawsuit settlement involving a former employee of Oakland’s Department of Violence…

READ ARTICLE
One recent case involving CleanNet USA, a janitorial franchising company, is a clear example of what can happen when employers try to sidestep labor laws.

Janitorial Company Pays Millions to California Workers Over Misclassification

Many California workers may not realize they are entitled to more legal protections than their job title suggests. This is especially true in industries where companies rely on complicated business models that…

READ ARTICLE
A recent case against Costco Wholesale Corp. reveals the legal obligations employers have beyond the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA).

Insights from the Costco Lawsuit: How Medical Leave and Reasonable Accommodations Intersect in California

When a medical crisis hits, workers often assume their employer will follow the law, offer support and make reasonable accommodations. But what happens when the company’s leave policy limits clash with California…

READ ARTICLE
Mobley alleges that Workday’s AI system discriminated against him based on his race, age and disability status.

When Algorithms Make the Decisions: What Workers Should Know About AI and Employment Discrimination

Hiring practices have changed dramatically in the last decade. Many job seekers today never speak to a person during the early stages of applying for work. Instead, they interact with software platforms…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10