California lawmakers set up independent panel to handle sexual harassment complaints

Recent high-profile sexual harassment cases in the state Capitol have led the California legislature to modify its policies and re-examine the way misconduct complaints are handled.

On June 25, a panel of lawmakers approved a new policy that involves setting up an independent unit in the legislative counsel’s office. Five outside experts will now be responsible for reviewing sexual harassment complaints filed by alleged victims. They will then recommend disciplinary action. However, Senate and Assembly lawmakers will still have the final say on how their colleagues and staffers are punished, whether it is through undergoing more training or termination.

The previous process for handling complaints has been criticized for being vague and sometimes biased against victims, who would have to file their claim with a committee of legislators. In addition, the Senate and Assembly had two different procedures, which created confusion.

The policy change is an effort to ease concerns about lawmakers’ loyalties to each other impacting their handling of misconduct allegations. Many victims said they were reluctant to report harassment because they assumed lawmakers would not punish their colleagues or employees.

The new policy is likely to be enforced by February 2019, almost a year and a half after more than a hundred women who work in politics wrote an open letter calling out a pervasive culture of sexual harassment in the Capitol. The letter led to a spike in complaints, scrutiny of the legislature’s policies and the resignation of three lawmakers accused of various sexual misconduct over the past year.

We Said Enough, the nonprofit organization that was founded with the letter’s publication, welcomed the policy change and said it would monitor its effectiveness. Ultimately, what matters is that legislative leaders consistently and strictly enforce their policies for handling sexual harassment complaints even after the issue is no longer in the public spotlight.

Read more

When workers face harassment or unfair treatment, the consequences can extend far beyond a bad day at the office.

Oakland Settles $1 Million Lawsuit After City Worker Reports Sexual Harassment and Retaliation by Successive Supervisors

When workers face harassment or unfair treatment, the consequences can extend far beyond a bad day at the office. A recent lawsuit settlement involving a former employee of Oakland’s Department of Violence…

READ ARTICLE
One recent case involving CleanNet USA, a janitorial franchising company, is a clear example of what can happen when employers try to sidestep labor laws.

Janitorial Company Pays Millions to California Workers Over Misclassification

Many California workers may not realize they are entitled to more legal protections than their job title suggests. This is especially true in industries where companies rely on complicated business models that…

READ ARTICLE
A recent case against Costco Wholesale Corp. reveals the legal obligations employers have beyond the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA).

Insights from the Costco Lawsuit: How Medical Leave and Reasonable Accommodations Intersect in California

When a medical crisis hits, workers often assume their employer will follow the law, offer support and make reasonable accommodations. But what happens when the company’s leave policy limits clash with California…

READ ARTICLE
Mobley alleges that Workday’s AI system discriminated against him based on his race, age and disability status.

When Algorithms Make the Decisions: What Workers Should Know About AI and Employment Discrimination

Hiring practices have changed dramatically in the last decade. Many job seekers today never speak to a person during the early stages of applying for work. Instead, they interact with software platforms…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
cnnmoney
marin-ij
dailypost
news10