Starbucks must pay workers for off-the-clock tasks, says Supreme Court
A landmark court ruling in a wage theft case against Starbucks could signal changes for employers throughout California. Starbucks can no longer avoid paying employees for time spent on performing tasks outside their regular work hours.
Former shift supervisor Douglas Troester filed a class action lawsuit against Starbucks in 2012. Troester said he and other employees were often required to set the store alarm, put away chairs, lock the door and complete other similar tasks after clocking out each day. He spent up to 10 minutes on the tasks each day, which added up to nearly 13 hours of unpaid work during his 17 months at Starbucks. The lawsuit claimed Troester missed out on more than $100 of pay during that time.
In 2014, a federal judge ruled in favor of Starbucks. The case was dismissed based on a federal wage law that says employers are not required to pay employees for working extra minutes beyond their regular daily hours as the time would be difficult to record. The California Supreme Court took on the case after Troester appealed. The court decided that the federal standard did not apply under California labor laws.
Under state law, employees should be paid for any time they spend on tasks at their workplace outside their normally scheduled hours. “$100 is enough to pay a utility bill, buy a week of groceries or cover a month of bus fares,” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote, adding that the so-called nominal amounts of money hold value for “many ordinary people who work for hourly wages.”
The ruling applies to thousands of current and former Starbucks workers throughout the state. It could also force many California companies to change their employment practices, particularly restaurants and retailers that employ hourly workers. Failure to do so could result in more wage theft lawsuits.
Read more
California Child Center Teacher Fired After Asking for Disability Accommodations
Employees with disabilities must receive reasonable workplace accommodations to allow them to perform their work duties and maintain their employment. Unfortunately, workers may face unfair treatment at work; an employer may attempt…
California Basketball Officials Association Faces Worker Misclassification Lawsuit
Independent contractors or employees? The distinction is more than just a label. It determines whether workers receive crucial labor protections like minimum wage, overtime pay, workers’ compensation and unemployment benefits. Although working…
False Accusations at Work: Lessons from Walmart’s $35 Million Defamation Verdict
Employment defamation can have devastating consequences for workers, leading to lost opportunities, emotional distress and damaged reputations. When false statements are made by an employer, particularly in the context of accusations of…
AARP Study Reveals Ongoing Struggles Against Workplace Age Discrimination
Age discrimination remains a persistent issue in workplaces, particularly for workers aged 50 and older. A study by AARP revealed that six in 10 workers over 50 have witnessed or experienced subtle…
SEEN ON



